Key Risks

Market Risks:

• Slashing Risks: The foremost concern for users is the potential for slashing on the consensus layer, which can amount to up to 50% of staked ETH. Moreover, any new slashing conditions imposed by the protocol could impact the remaining 50% of staked ETH. This means that if users engage in malicious behavior, they risk losing up to 100% of their staked ETH. While this serves as an incentive for honest behavior, it presents a substantial risk.

• Centralization Risks: Restaking Protocols may attract ETH stakers seeking higher yields, potentially redirecting their withdrawal credentials to the platform. This shift towards protocols creates centralization risks, as it concentrates staking activity. In the event of exploitation or vulnerability within Restaking protocols, it poses a systemic risk to the broader Ethereum network.

• Yield Risk: As restaking gains more traction, protocols may use Ethereum for enhanced security. However, retakers may prioritize maximizing their returns by seeking the highest yield available. This can lead to a competitive race among protocols to offer higher yields to attract restakers. While this benefits restakers, it may result in lower yields for users of these protocols, creating a potential yield risk.

• Security RIsks: The primary concern with liquid staking is security. Staked assets are typically held in smart contracts, which may have vulnerabilities and be susceptible to hacking or cyber-attacks. This means your original assets are in the hands of a third party, increasing counterparty risk.

• Low Liquidity & De-Pegging: Liquid staking tokens rely on liquidity pools to maintain their peg to the underlying assets. If liquidity in these pools decreases significantly, it can lead to a loss of peg, resulting in high slippage when swapping between assets. Investors may find it challenging to sell their staked assets promptly.

• Hacks: Smart contract vulnerabilities can expose your original assets to theft if the protocol gets hacked. For instance, if you mint liquid-staked assets using your cryptocurrency, a hack on the protocol could jeopardize your initial holdings.

• Validator Slashing & Counterparty Risk: Liquid staking providers manage the staking process, including selecting validators. If unreliable validators are chosen, there's a risk of asset slashing. Operational issues like system downtime or network outages can also impact the safety of staked assets. To mitigate this, it's crucial to select reputable and trusted providers.

---

Risk Mitigations & Prevention

To maintain the security of the Inception Protocol, several practices and mechanisms are employed:

1. Multi-Signature (Multi-Sig) Wallets:

Multi-sig wallets require multiple private keys to authorize transactions. In a DeFi protocol, key actions, such as making significant changes to the protocol or withdrawing funds, may require the approval of multiple key holders. This adds an extra layer of security by reducing the risk of a single point of failure.

2. Audits:

Security audits involve third-party cybersecurity experts reviewing the protocol's codebase and architecture to identify vulnerabilities, bugs, or potential weaknesses. Audits help identify and address security issues before they are exploited by malicious actors.

3. On-Chain Monitoring and Analytics:

InceptionLRT implements on-chain monitoring tools to keep track of transactions, activities, and potential anomalies. This allows for the detection of suspicious or unauthorized activities in real-time.

4. Bug Bounties:

Bug bounty programs encourage external security researchers and developers to discover and report vulnerabilities in exchange for rewards. By incentivizing the broader community to identify and report bugs, DeFi protocols benefit this way from a diverse range of expertise in identifying potential security flaws.

5. Code Upgrades and Governance:

InceptionLRT has upgrade mechanisms that allow for improvements to the protocol's security and functionality. These upgrades are often subject to decentralized governance processes that involve token holders or stakeholders voting on proposed changes. This helps prevent unilateral and potentially risky changes to the protocol.

6. Decentralization:

DeFi protocols strive for decentralization, spreading decision-making power and control among various participants. Decentralization helps to mitigate the risk of single points of failure and reduce the influence of malicious actors.

7. Constant Monitoring and Response:

Security teams continuously monitor the protocol for emerging threats. In the event of a security breach or vulnerability, rapid response measures are taken to minimize the impact and protect users’ funds.